Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Dereste Dorcely

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Dereste Dorcely[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tagged this as a BLPPROD because none of the references pass WP:RS, but the notice was removed uncommented upon. So it is now at AfD, no notability asserted, no reliable sources. Fiddle Faddle 14:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - References are not valid, even deleted my maintenance tags for no reason. Did not W:Assume good faith. SefBau : msg 15:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems the same author with a different account created Jayme Karales, same blogs and references used. SefBau : msg 15:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment References from websites added to Jayme Karales and Ken Dereste Dorcely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.190.68 (talk) 15:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the references pass Reliable Source (WP:RS). Need references in reliable sources eg. New York Times, Variety, Billboard, etc.. they have to be independent of the Dorcely, not websites operated by Dorcely ("official" websites are the exact opposite of a reliable source). The sources have to be about Dorcely, not by Dorcely (the iTunes source is by Dorcely). The sources can't be blogs, like nostroviawriting. The article has 0 valid references. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.