Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Scott (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After expansion, the consensus, although slim, is keep. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Scott (disambiguation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hatnote at primary does the trick. See also is lame. Brycehughes (talk) 15:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~delete~~ per nom and per WP:TWODABS.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 15:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: a second hatnote at the basename (added) does the trick - the See Also is useful because the pair of names could be confusable. 17:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PamD (talk • contribs) 17:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Brycehughes, JohnBlackburne, PamD, this had a third entry which could have been added, a valid entry per MOS:DABMENTION. This now has three valid entries and a see also, which I don't agree is 'lame' but could be confusing. We are here to make it as easy as possible for readers to find information on any name. We have information on WP on 3 Kelly Scotts and also several Scott Kellys. Nothing to be gained from deletion and pages meet WP:DISAMBIGUATION guidelines. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Adding a Kelley and a Kelli makes it an okay dab page. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
changing my !vote to keep due to its expansion.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 00:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.