Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kekma Forum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kekma Forum[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage from reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. NotAGenious (talk) 10:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites. NotAGenious (talk) 10:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notable coverage, maybe redirect to Shock site. It's not a very notable meme, either. 108.21.221.8 (talk) 02:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Possible speedy delete per A7, as it says that the website holds a “significant importance to meme culture”, but never explains how so. The Know Your Meme link might count, but there are far more notable memes without Wikipedia pages. 108.21.221.8 (talk) 17:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Sources provided do not justify this having its own article. This page was also previously speedy deleted under a previous title (KEKMA FORUM in all caps). Deauthorized. ^(talk) 03:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably best to speedy under G5 and A7. 67.174.19.131 (talk) 01:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.