Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Rabois

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Rabois[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack comprehensive coverage from secondary sources to establish notability. xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 23:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 23:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 23:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 23:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources already in the article with both good and bad coverage so there is certainly independent content. I can't help but wonder if the deletion of this article would be to the benefit of the subject as it contains content that is far from flattering, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:36, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: Could you help point us to which one or several of the reference link(s) you think establishing notability? xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 04:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

07:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, he is often in the news, tied to many prominent affairs in tech in the Silicon Valley and has been important in many big companies. He averages pretty high daily views on the Wiki page: https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=all-time&pages=Keith_Rabois which means there is interest from the general public too. A quick internet search of his name will bring up articles in all major newspapers and media sources, from the New York Times to Fox.Eccekevin (talk) 22:32, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 05:47, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete it's been two weeks and neither keep voter materialized the sources on him that they claimed existed and all I could find about him was the usual VC fluff piece that always seem to exist for people like him. Like what his prediction for some industry is or what firm he's joining. None of that passes the threshold for notability though. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.