Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Patrick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Patrick[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ACTOR as he hasn't starred in any notable film, tv show or other. Article only cites IMDb and I was unable to find enough coverage in a WP:BEFORE for him to clear the general notability guidelines. RetiredDuke (talk) 13:59, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:11, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:11, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Like the nominator, following a search of sources/news articles/etc, I have come up with nothing to suggest that WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR are met. On NACTOR, the only material that I could find is that already listed on IMDB. And, at that, none of it suggests that the subject has had "significant roles in multiple notable [works]". On GNG, I can find no interviews, editorials or other news items that would suggest that the subject has been the topic of significant coverage. In short, the subject here doesn't seem to meet the relevant notability guidelines. Delete. Guliolopez (talk) 23:10, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete Unsourced BLP and no evidence he meets any standard under WP:NACTOR. Sandals1 (talk) 15:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could not find any support that meets WP:GNG. --JAMillerKC (talk) 17:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.