Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Paras

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 01:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Paras[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:Artist or WP:GNG. Found next to nothing for this artist on a quick search after excluding Wikipedia/Linkedin/Facebook. However, he might be notable in the Philippines, so bringing to discussion. Mabalu (talk) 06:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete - no sources provided or found. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 07:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:04, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No indication of notability in the article (student prizes, group exhibitions and a couple of solo shows fall a long way short of WP:ARTIST criteria), nor have I found anything suitable in other searches including Highbeam, which has various Philippines newspapers in its scope. AllyD (talk) 10:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Pediapediahan, the creator, has left a message on my talk page. I have advised them to come here to understand the reasoning and procedures and notability concerns. They have asked if it can be userfied to them, but I am not sure if the article will ever be notable enough to go live (unless Keith Paras goes on to achieve notability very quickly.). As it is apparently a school project, maybe a move to Pediapediahan's userspace would be a civil way to handle it? Mabalu (talk) 11:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unfortunately, he hasn't gotten enough reliable coverage in reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.