Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith McLaughlin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I'll userfy it on the user's request. Sandstein 19:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keith McLaughlin[edit]
- Keith McLaughlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Vanity article Jvhertum 09:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy. Seems like an appropriate userpage, but not sufficiently notable for a mainspace article. Will leave message on author's talk page suggesting so. --JaimeLesMaths (talk!edits) 10:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy if the author wants it, otherwise, delete as non notable, unless reliable, independent published, non trivial sources can be found. J Milburn 12:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if no reliable sources are added by end of this AfD Alf photoman 14:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.