Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith M. Moore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Without prejudice against a redirect to an editorially appropriate article he is mentioned in j⚛e decker ^talk 00:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keith M. Moore[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable IMO, fails WP:SOLDIER and GNG Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, This guy led a $3 billion program. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 08:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:05, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete cant really see any indication of notability, being a program manager is not particularly notable. MilborneOne (talk) 17:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pending independent sources — Currently, the only source is the US Marine Corps, which certainly reliably documents the Colonel's existence, but does nothing to satisfy WP:NOTE / WP:BIO. He was awarded the Bronze Star, Meritorious Service, and Navy & Marine Commendation, so one would expect that there's probably, at the very least, a local article or something about him somewhere; and it wouldn't take much to satisfy notability if one or two of those can be found; but without that, WP rules say not notable. As Gbawden points out, and I missed it before, WP:SOLDIER is even clearer, and Moore doesn't make the cut according to those specific notability requirements (unless some other source demonstrating notability can be found). — Who R you? Talk 18:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not appear to have significant coverage in multiple reliable sources per WP:GNG, and we wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt based on his rank or awards, per WP:SOLDIER. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle fiasco is clearly notable. The various people who ran this program aren't. Nick-D (talk) 10:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reluctantly have to agree with you on this one. The Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle is a fiasco. Moore has been working on it since 2005, as program manager since August 2008, and I think his prospects of promotion to brigadier general are getting slim. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.