Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Dixon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Dixon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NMUSIC; article I suspect is probably promotional. Barney the barney barney (talk) 14:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — The subject clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO, the one reliable source in the article is an interview with one of his collaborators that does not mention him. STATic message me! 19:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant 3rd-party reliable sources to establish WP:BAND notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What about the article with the examiner? That's not a credible 3rd party source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheShopArt (talk • contribs) 01:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly fails WP:BAND, not to mention WP:GNG. Possible WP:COI. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.