Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keir Thomas (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ 03:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keir Thomas[edit]

Keir Thomas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not look to me as if this journalist, writer and publisher meets WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. The coverage is book reviews. I have not been able to find any additional references to add. (Edited to add: I realise book reviews do count towards notability, but it looks as if two of the reviews are blogposts, one is a deadlink and I'n not entirely sure of the WP:RSness of the others.) Tacyarg (talk) 11:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 11:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 11:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 11:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 11:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 11:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 11:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Flori4nK tc 15:27, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.