Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keiana Cavé

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keiana Cavé[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources - Forbes, NOLA, MTV. Also WP:BIAS — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaryALeung (talk • contribs) 00:39, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What we have here is a girl who was one of 30 yearly Forbes scholars. Not super special. I agree her resume is impressive for a kid, but her legacy is currently unencyclopedic Jamalcrao (talk) 05:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:03, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 06:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 06:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While being named on that list certainly contributes to notability, it is not sufficient in itself. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unfortunately, this seems like a case of WP:PROMOTION. I hope, however, that her article can be resurrected in the future as more accomplishments follow. Right now, this article also seems to have a case of one-itis, in which the subject is only notable for being a member of the Forbes 30 Under 30, thus violating WP:GNG. Carajou (talk) 19:56, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yeah, even I agree this is a puff piece. Montanabw^(talk) 21:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Maybe WP:TOOSOON. Tacyarg (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.