Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keel Forest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keel Forest[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been in CAT:NN since 2015. From what I can tell, this is somebody's private forest park in Kentucky. I'm unable to find any significant coverage in independent sources for this. Probable COI involved, as this was created by User:Traviskeel, and mostly maintained by a user who has only edited this article and has attempted to add the phone number. Not seeing any notability here. Hog Farm _Bacon 21:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 21:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 21:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with Hog Farm on this - I can find nothing in a WP:BEFORE search. SportingFlyer T·C 14:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is zero third-party news sources that help establish why this private park is notable. All there is is a Google Maps listing done twice, in both References and External Links.TH1980 (talk) 05:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there are some social media or blog posts by a Travis Allen Keel that refer to him as a curator at Keel Forest, but no independent, reliable sources at all. Vexations (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent WP:RS, also doesn’t meet WP:GNG. Elms^super 05:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.