Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kebon Kelapa, Gambir
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Kebon Kelapa, Gambir[edit]
- Kebon Kelapa, Gambir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This stub is basically a mirror of the Wp:id stub http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kebon_Kelapa,_Gambir,_Jakarta_Pusat - it has no evident WP:N, WP:RS or WP:CITE to justify a stub. The higher level article about Gambir should contain the information. SatuSuro 06:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep All populated places are notable. Lugnuts (talk) 08:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment you have to be kidding - find something that justifies WP:N, WP:RS, for such low level populated areas, Gambir is notable not its component parts SatuSuro 09:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per long-standing AfD precedent, verifiable populated places are notable, partly because Wikipedia functions as a gazetteer and partly because sources can almost always be found for these articles. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 07:08, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - assured that you find sources for the 7,000 Indonesian kelurahans you want to add to wikipedia, have fun and dont forget the precedent in itself is contra logic, even for gazzetter meanings - component villages fo places do not necessarily show up on a conventional gazzetteer - we have alresdy tried to explain gambir is fine, its sub components are not valid verifiable apart from post codes and the potential for reliable sources or genuine notability is zilch for 99% of cases - please could we default the major conversation to Gambir, Gambir SatuSuro 08:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per long standing precedent that real places are inherently notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Gambir, Jakarta - were this an independent community, it would be a WP:SNOW keep per WP:OUTCOMES. However, it is not - it's a subdivision/neighbourhood of Jakarta, and, as such, should be redirected to the city it is actually part of. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.