Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keating Muething & Klekamp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keating Muething & Klekamp[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost all the references are from the firm's website or from advertising and/or firm created. The only independent RS I see is the article about DeWine joining and this. DeWine joining belongs with DeWine. A google search [1] produces almost entirely advertisements. It might be notable, but I'm not seeing secondary sources for it. --David Tornheim (talk) 04:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 04:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. the usual quasi-advertisement from a law firm. DGG ( talk ) 02:41, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Should've been a soft delete. Let's make it a hard one. Pure corpspam. Nha Trang ^Allons! 19:29, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.