Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazumi Tanaka (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kazumi Tanaka[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just because there's news that detail the subject's death, that doesn't mean he's actually all that notable. There are no notable roles of the subject to speak of. At all. Due to the subject being non-notable by not even having a singular notable role, I can't even suggest a role to redirect the subject to. Sk8erPrince (talk) 11:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC) _{Note to reader:This user is now tbanned from these discussions please don't respond to them directly as they can not reply and it could possibly be triggering for them. --Adam in MO Talk 04:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)}[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lots of roles but all supporting or minor. JA wikipedia article is a stub that doesn't have much development for a non-BLP. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable.SephyTheThird (talk) 11:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.