Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaylantice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:26, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kaylantice[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is on an IPhone app. Notability anyone? –BuickCentury Driver 19:17, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I believe this should have been PROD'ed. Salvidrim! 18:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I think the nomination could have been a little more thought-out (iPhone Apps can be notable, that's not a reason to delete it outright.) However, that being said, I haven't been able to find any coverage for this thing, and the article is in terrible shape... Sergecross73 msg me 17:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no significant coverage. 7 G-hits, lololol. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence notability under [[WP:GNG}]. --joe decker ^{talk to me} 21:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage, doesn't meet WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 13:05, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NSOFT. -- Trevj (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.