Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayden Magnuson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 08:27, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kayden Magnuson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be moved to the TV show. Way too soon for sure (of course she is very young so maybe she will deserve her own page eventually, but for now a redirect) Wgolf (talk) 19:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- Sam ^Sing! 19:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Sam ^Sing! 19:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Sam ^Sing! 19:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (orate) @ 21:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As usual, WP:NACTOR does not confer an automatic notability freebie on every single actor who happens to have an IMDb page, because all actors (even ones who only have a single credited "background extra" role) have IMDb pages. It's reliable source coverage, not confirmation of mere existence, that gets an actor into Wikipedia — but no evidence of any RS coverage has been demonstrated here, and the television series on which her claim of notability has been staked has not even premiered yet. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when the sourcing is there. Bearcat (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Her one role is in a work that has not even been released yet. Way to soon to assert notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.