Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kay Kriesel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (A7/test/vandalism) After a manual translation I came to the conclusion the machine translation was solid and a clear case for deletion. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kay Kriesel[edit]

Appears to be in German Paste (talk) 18:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Shouldn't it be translated before an AfD decision is made? I have tagged with notenglish, and machine translation [1] was inconclusive as to the merits of the content. gnfnrf (talk) 18:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Translates rougly as: "Kay Kriesel Selfappointed rebel and from Germany. Has recognized the signs of the time and fights against the Illuminati. Has also recognized that there are only spectator's democracies. Holds all governments worldwide for corrupt and dishonest. Sees that all that what by the policy and the television media comes only one is: Sound and smoke. Long live the autonomy!!!" Spitfire^Tally-ho! 18:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per the translation Spitfire^Tally-ho! 18:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What I was saying above is that I can't tell if the translation's apparent lack of credibility is a fault of the article, or a fault of the machine translator, and I'd like to wait for a German speaker to translate the article (or a reasonable time to pass, as per the notenglish template.) gnfnrf (talk) 18:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I see where your coming from, I "withdraw" my comment for now, but it will return in a few days (even if no german translator has turned up) or if arguments here sway me Spitfire^Tally-ho! 19:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a native German speaker, but I am pretty good with it. Good enough to know that the machine translation was pretty accurate. Together with the copyright notice at the bottom, that is sufficient reason to speedy delete A7. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.