Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kavi Anil Patil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 12:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kavi Anil Patil[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO with only primary sources. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 15:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - NN poet lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. It appears when outright removal of CSD tags failed to stop deletion process, the author created this second article to try to stop deletion. reddogsix (talk) 15:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating the alternate titles used, in case the author disrupts the process again:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

-- Cabayi (talk) 07:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. The author originally created Anil Patil which I tagged BLPPROD, then added a non-reliable source, blanked the first article and recreated it at this title or Anil Anantrao Patil where BLPPROD could no longer be applied. The author is blatantly gaming the system. Cabayi (talk) 07:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging GeoffreyT2000 & reddogsix in case the additional nominations affect their votes/comments in any way. Cabayi (talk) 07:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the earlier (deleted) edits are by User:Ambar.patil :: may be advertizing himself or a family relative? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.