Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katya dahl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Katya dahl[edit]

Hoax/Vanity. Claims to be a 15 year old actress/published poet. Nothing on IMDb, google returns 7 unique google hits, none of which confirm article's claims. TheMidnighters 04:17, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'd actually researched all of the above earlier today, but was too lazy to nominate it. If only there were an easier way to nominate articles for deletion... --Maxamegalon2000 04:25, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Use the {{prod}} tag.--み使い Mitsukai 16:19, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I hope it was obvious that I was only feigning ignorance. --Maxamegalon2000 04:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Mikker ^... 04:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. *drew 08:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully she won't grow up to be another diva. Regardless, delete.--み使い Mitsukai 16:22, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn.Blnguyen 00:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable right now. Yamaguchi先生 02:37, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ardenn 06:05, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article does not explain why this person is notable. Gerard Foley 21:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.