Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katsiaryna Beinenson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Katsiaryna Beinenson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Youth chess player who lacks at the moment the required notability. Doesn't meet WP:GNG, doesn't meet the project notability guidelines Wikipedia:NCHESS. A Women FIDE Master is the third level of specific Women titles, which have lower thresholds than the general Chess Master titles (which are also open to women). There are as of March 2019 nearly 3,000 women chess players who have the same or a higher Women FIDE level. As far as I can see, she hasn't won any major senior titles (she did win the U14 European women's title). Fram (talk) 11:46, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 13:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 13:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's a big contradiction that chess tournaments like EYCC and WYCC are notable but their winners are not notable. Important chess tournaments without important chess players.--Uldis s (talk) 13:42, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not really a contradiction, there is always a bottom line where something is important but aspects of it aren't. An organisation can be notable without the chairman being notable, and so on. For these tournamens, we have articles on the championship as a whole, but not for individual championships by year, which indicates that this is not a truly important title. It even has an U8 category, we should not be creating articles for 7 or 8 year old chess players (in fact, I'll go and nominate Ece Alkim Erece for deletion now). Fram (talk) 13:55, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No coverage outside of routine tournament results, and youth championships are not sufficient for notability.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 12:44, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.