Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katrina Turner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Katrina Turner[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears non-notable, national-level winner of minor beauty pagents. Blanked by an individual editor whose username matches the URL of her website. Declined a G7 since this was not the page creator, but I still think this is not notable enough to exist. Courcelles (talk) 21:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Courcelles (talk) 21:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Courcelles (talk) 21:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Courcelles (talk) 21:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the only claim of notability is roles in a series of minor pageants (and the article says she both organized and won the same pageant?), which probably wouldn't be sufficient even if well-sourced; sourcing is atrocious - mostly broken links to social media sites. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:22, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Pageants were minor. If she was a winner of a well-known pageant and had the significant coverage to support, things would be different. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough singificant coverage to even qualify for this article, which it does not meet the WP:BLP and WP:GNG. Sheldybett (talk) 13:17, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable beauty queen.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.