Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Kox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete; weight of consensus is on the side of deletion. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Kox[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards, just nominations; by repeatedly demonstrated consensus, Urban X award does not meet PORNBIO's "well-known/significant" requirement. No independent reliable sourcing, just promo sources and award-related announcements. No reliably sourced biographical content. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - winner, meet of the PORNBIO. There is no consensus for Urban X award. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Under the current "well-known"/"significant" PORNBIO standard, there hsve been a dozen or so deletion discussions which addressed these awards directly. All but one closed as "delete", one closed "no consensus". That's a pretty solid demonstration of the community's view, which is just about the polar opposite of yours. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom —Мандичка^YO 😜 05:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Seemingly not currently fully satisfying the applicable notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 08:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Urban X Award winner.--Hillary Scott`love (talk) 18:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as several other stars articles have been deleted when the Urban X award was their only real claim at notability. The organization was questionable (not to mention short-lived) anyway with the large number of awards given to others closely connected to the runner of the awards, Giana Taylor. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 22:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - As stunning as she is looks unfortunately mean jack notability-wise!, Fails PORNBIO and GNG. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 22:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.