Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Kerwin McCrimmon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Kerwin McCrimmon[edit]

Only claims to fame are winning national spelling bee and yearly role providing commentary on the spelling bee Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan (talk) 12:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. Winning National Spelling Bee demonstrates notability; winner typically receives substantial TV/print media coverage, if only briefly. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then WP:BLP1E comes into play. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My impression is that, by consensus, winning a notable award or event "trumps" BLP1E. Besides, this nomination was broken out because the winner had other claims to notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sai R. Gunturi. Note for closing admin: If Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sai R. Gunturi is closed as keep, this probably should be as well as it was split out because McCrimmon is more notable than the ones listed there. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 22:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 22:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.