Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Gold (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimity that she fails WP:ACTOR and more broadly WP:GNG. Just Chilling (talk) 21:08, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Gold[edit]

Katie Gold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another porn performer bio with sourcing that falls light-years, in this case parsecs, short of what is required for BLPs, but which survived AFD a decade ago. With PORNBIO deprecated and porn industry awards standing slone not establishing notability, there's no basis for retaining this negligibly dourced stub. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 20:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC) [reply]
  • Delete as there is a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources so WP:GNG is not passed. From a google search please note that there are quite a few people with this name in hockey, arts etc but with this person I only found porn sites. Regarding the book mentioned in the external links it only gives her a namecheck with a date and place of birth in a list of Texas porn stars, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:53, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable individual, not enough sourcing to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the Article. It Fails GNG and the subject is not notable, too.Forest90 (talk) 11:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No sign of notability. AmericanAir88(talk) 00:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:ACTOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Concur with nominator. Finnegas (talk) 20:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.