Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Sarah Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kathryn Sarah Scott[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Not notable musician, two of the references are dead links. Fails all counts of Wikipedia:MUSICBIO and thus WP:N SheffGruff (talk) 13:59, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, I found some independent coverage of her works, see: "Hungry," in particular, sold more than 400,000 copies – an impressive figure for a worship recording.", [1] (Crosswalk.com), [2] (The Citizen), [3] (Christian Broadcasting Network). --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 16:11, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep If we were to take the Crosswalk article at face value, she is highly influential in her genre, thus notable. Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 09:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on what I saw myself of the sources. Yes, it could be improved, but AfD is not for normal editing issues. Bearian (talk) 20:06, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.