Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn S. Fuller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 21:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kathryn S. Fuller[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Old article that's been edited recently (so a PROD template might get removed.) Not a lot of third-party sources showing up on Google. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 13:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Law, Rhode Island, and Texas. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 13:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sourcing of any kind found in GSearch, many individuals with a similar name. Unsourced article, delete for non-notability. Oaktree b (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. She attracted quite a bit of coverage when she discovered a new species of ant. However maybe that's a BLP1E. e.g.
- Campbell, Charlie (21 October 1990). "New ant species found in wildlife activist's plant". Corvalis Gazette-Times. AP. p. 20.
- "Possible new ant species found on wildlife chief's desk". Arizona Daily Star. AP. 16 October 1990. p. 2.
pburka (talk) 17:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. An honorary degree is a strong indicator of notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This book has significant coverage. I'm sure there are more, because I can't envision the possibility that someone could be president and CEO of the World Wildlife Fund and not have plenty of coverage. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She was President and Chief Executive Officer of the World Wildlife Fund. And holds a number of honorary degrees. Seems to meet the notability threshold. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Eastmain, Phil Bridger and Necrothesp. Someone with an honorary degree is very likely to be notable. Someone just needs to do an in-depth Google Books search. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 00:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Unsual for a senior female not to have standard RS for GNG, but she slightly pre-dates online media. Definitely gets full sections (SIGCOV) in American Social Leaders and Activists, and also in American Women Speak: An Encyclopedia and Document Collection, and Women Pioneers For The Environment. Kind of person that gets formal obituaries in the NYT and WPO. Aszx5000 (talk) 09:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.