Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Saxton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kathleen Saxton[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable source discuss about her in detail. Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable businesswoman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:24, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This one does look like a corporate puff piece. Montanabw^(talk) 16:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a non notable business person. My searches do not turn up anything substantial to meet GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Most of sources used within the article do not make any mention of her. Within the article there is one online source that is registered with ABC (UK) which offers a Q&A with her, but this is not enough on its own to demonstrate notability when judged against WP:BASIC. Drchriswilliams (talk) 08:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.