Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Marie Sweet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kathleen Marie Sweet[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL as a failed judicial nominee. A redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies seems reasonable. Let'srun (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Law, and New York. Let'srun (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. You will find several Google hits when you search for "Kathleen M Sweet" rather than the full name. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies per nom (thanks for unbundling this from the rest, makes things a lot easier). There is a noticeable lack of sources on this person (no matter what version of the name is entered) outside of the WP:BLP1E failed judicial nomination. Take the paragraph on that nomination out of the article, and all we're left with is a WP:RESUME. The target article retains the basic info just fine. StonyBrook _babble 03:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Are you just going to keep nominating each judicial article individually until you get you desired result? Because that's how it's starting to come off. Snickers2686 (talk) 03:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of these people appear notable. SportingFlyer T·C 12:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sources in the article don't demonstrate she passes WP:GNG. No problem with an AtD. SportingFlyer T·C 12:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies per nom and StonyBrook. Sal2100 (talk) 21:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.