Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Watney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). Additionally, a merge discussion can be initiated on a talk page if desired. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Watney[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no third party source for notability and nor reason to expect any. The references are only to archives. DGG ( talk ) 06:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Merge into Church of England Zenana Missionary Society - It's just a case of insufficient sources; not for deletion. STSC (talk) 03:26, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Based on the information presented this person might have been featured in literature about James Watney and Leonard Sharland. There are some records of her work but I am not sure if these are just archival logs or anything which reported what she did. Also for some reason the article creator posted a picture of a house named Burnside and said that it was hers, but the article says nothing about that house and the picture has no copyright information. I know that notability is not inherited per WP:INHERIT but considering this is a biography from the 1800s, and that there are some records about this person, and that she seems to appear in the narratives of two notable people and the story of some old building, all together I might take that coverage as meeting WP:GNG. Josdeng, won't you please say something here about the records you found? Can you post copyright information on the picture you uploaded of that house, and say if you took the picture yourself or who owns the copyright? Where are you getting this information? Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.