Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Crossley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kate Crossley[edit]
- Kate Crossley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non notable small time actress, in a bit part role, look as if somebody placed this just for the sake of it Knock-Off Nigel (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No major parts to make her notable. Random Fixer Of Things (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BIO and WP:N. --Sc straker (talk) 00:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Almost certainly created in an attempt to support the case for keeping the Natasha Collins article. Apart from a role in a children's series which is alreay adequately covered in the show's own article, she's had a bit-part in a film, two one-episode roles in a popular drama and appeared in an insignificant five-minute short film. Not really enough. - 88.109.209.253 (talk) 09:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A definite candidate for deletion. Even less notable than Natasha Collins. Brett Leaford (talk) 12:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 10:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, only possible notability is the very weak connection to Natasha Collins. Other than that, just a garden variety bit-part actor. Pass the WP:BIO. Lankiveil (talk) 12:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete She is a Joe (or perhaps that should be Jo) Average and non-notable. Without the recent events surrounding Natasha Collins, she would probably never have had an article written about her.Egdirf (talk) 23:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.