Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Botello

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Botello[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Lacking inline citations for over 3 years, and none of the links look reliable or are first party. Ir d'hore arachkallez (talk) 11:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google Books shows a snippet from the New Yorker mentioning her role (albeit as cameo) in the Judy Garland play. But I am not finding any reliable sources that confirm biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 06:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Her notability comes from two years of co-hosting The Screen Savers starting in 1998. I've expanded the article a bit and added three references. Although she is now mostly out of the public eye, notability is not temporary. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is 2 years as co-host of a cable/satellite TV programme really enough to establish biographical notability? Personally I think that tends to the person-with-a-job end of matters, skirting WP:NOTINHERITED, rather than demonstrably meeting WP:ENT #1 or #2. I notice there is a potted biography on The_Screen_Savers#Previous_hosts_and_supporting_members; if sourced there, an alternative would be a redirect. AllyD (talk) 19:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, answering your question is the purpose of this debate, isn't it, AllyD? I see enthusiastic language used by reliable sources about her work on that show, and praise of her Judy Garland work as well. So, I think she scrapes by notability, but understand that you don't. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is my first article AFD in favor of keeping. My husband is Cullen328 and we discussed the article. References have been added, external links have been included. As a Bay Area native I remember watching the broadcasts on local TV. This person is notable and the article should not be deleted.ChesPal (talk) 00:49, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.