Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Badoe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Badoe[edit]

Kate Badoe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks likely to fail WP:CREATIVE KH-1 (talk) 06:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, and Ghana. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. On the evidence shown, she does fail WP:CREATIVE. Unlike some, I am ready to consider recent prices realized as evidence of notability, but $ 2,000 is well below that threshold - $25K might do it. Johnbod (talk) 13:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I've found that high sold prices for an artist's work is a half-decent indicator of notability, however, low prices do not indicate non-notability. There are probably hundreds (or thousands) of notable artists on Wikipedia whose work sells for under $1000, especially artists whose work has fallen out of favour but they still merit an article based on the sourcing. Curiocurio (talk) 12:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd doubt that - for paintings of any size - prints and even drawings of course are different. But this price was produced as though leading evidence of notability. Johnbod (talk) 13:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.