Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kat Stacks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kat Stacks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails general notability guideline. Non-notable person, predominantly speculative bio. 2igloo (talk) 05:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

— 2igloo (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Delete Has little to no notability whatsoever. Fails WP:NOTABILITY and WP:BIO Yousou (talk) 16:59, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep She is notable, and the vandalism of the page demostrate it. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 18:36, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep she has some level of noteablity and the coverage in XXL tells you that. Red Flag on the Right Side 04:13, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete She has no notability other than being talked about on gossip websites. She has also posted this page on her twitter as an official website, and I think that's what she intends to make it, so there goes the nuetral point of view. SashaJohn (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete YouTube, Urban Dictionary, and Twitter are not reliable sources. I don't really see the notability. --Bsa dow ski1 05:25, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, obviously getting a lot of attention from gossip sites and blogs but lacks the coverage in reliable sources that would meet WP:BIO. Cassandra 73 (talk) 16:40, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete none of the sources are reliable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. No legit claim of notability, no reliable sourcing, BLP minefield potential. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.