Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasun Hewage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kasun Hewage[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is an Associate Professor. Not notable under WP:PROF or WP:GNG. A series of general references provided which mention the subject in passing but do not establish notability.Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -Not notable. ABF99 (talk) 04:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- No claim to notability and fails GNG. -- Shudde ^talk 04:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Not significantly notable. And per above rationales. -- Chamith (talk) 07:35, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article presents no evidence of notability and his citation record is not strong enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.