Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasumalgarh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kasumalgarh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was originally written in Hindi and had been left untranslated for 14 days. Then it was prodded according to the procedure set out at WP:PNT. Soon after the prod, the current text was added which looks like a badly-done automated translation of the Hindi version. In its current state it is even worse now. In my opinion the article is beyond repair and should be rewritten from scratch in proper English. The 14 days of time for translation are up, and the current version does not deserve the attribute "translated". De728631 (talk) 17:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Blow it up and start over. This article is beyond repair. - HyperGaruda (talk) 04:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there is a draft version at Draft:Kasumalgarh, so there is even less need for this to be in mainspace. - HyperGaruda (talk) 04:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as barely comprehensible, nothing at least minimally better for a better Wikipedia article. SwisterTwister talk 07:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly agree with you! --208.54.4.142 (talk) 20:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete despite being a potentially notable topic, it is beyond help in its current form. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as junk and being incomprehensible --CasetteTapeMaster (talk) 05:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.