Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasia Wrobel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 20:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kasia Wrobel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to establish WP:N. Article reads like a resume. References are listing or pictures and are trivial in nature. reddogsix (talk) 18:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added a ref to it, but don't know if its reliable. I don't know Polish to be honest.--Mishae (talk) 20:56, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 23:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 23:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:42. The New Yorker source is merely a listing. I'd change my !vote if somebody could find three more reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 21:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bearian: Haven't you seen the other 2 sources?--Mishae (talk) 03:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Mishae, yes, of course I look at the sources, but the Elle article has only a brief mention and one single image of the model, and the other does not look like a reliable source. Bearian (talk)
Weak delete. So far the sources in the article offer only a paragraph at best, little more. WP:TOOSOON? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not nearly enough coverage in the sources. I counted a total of 10 sentences from the three sources, one of which is only a listing, not an article. Definitely a case of WP:TOOSOON, if ever. LaMona (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.