Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Kashmir. MBisanz talk 12:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world[edit]

Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page seems to be about a quote from a Bill Clinton, fails WP:GNG NickGibson3900 Talk 22:28, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Sure, some people called Kashmir TMDPITW,[1][2] but you can find others who called Somalia that,[3][4] or Syria.[5] That Clinton quote had no lasting power. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Kashmir, or whichever event(s) this sentiment is based on (PS. quoting the article, "nuclear war between India and Pakistan over the issue of Kashmir"), perhaps as "Some, including Bill Clinton, once considered Kashmir 'the most dangerous place in the world' (due to this incident)." This opinion would be notable (under that cause, not separately) if multiple notable people and/or reliable sources called on that in the wake of that cause. 野狼院ひさし Hisashi Yarouin 08:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Notability is not inherited. While the dispute is quite notable, this quote can atmost get a mention in the dispute article (that too if requred in context of a descriptive section). --lTopGunl (talk) 13:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It is just a journalistic headline. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:07, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The subject is amply covered by the Kargil war page. People interested in the headline can add it there. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:02, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This information satisfies the criteria as an independent topic.

Continuing threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan is the strongest fact to support this topic.

The purpose of Wikipedia is to provide facts to general public.

The topic "Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world" was the opinion of President Bill Clinton. However, his opinion was supported by the facts presented in a book, “Engaging India: Diplomacy, Democracy and the Bomb” by former US Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott.

This book is praised by prestigious institutions such as Yale and Foreign Affairs (http://www.foreignaffairs.com). Maakhter (talk) 10:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


======================================[edit]

Which guidelines and policies were used to create following pages?


Cuban missile crisis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_missile_crisis


Cold War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War


Nuclear arms race

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_arms_race

The nuclear arms race was a competition for supremacy in nuclear warfare between the United States, the Soviet Union, and their respective allies during the Cold War.


Soviet Union–United States relations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union%E2%80%93United_States_relations


Maakhter (talk) 20:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Here is another statement. Need more statements?

US deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage said, “there are a lot of other dangerous parts in the world. India and Pakistan over Kashmir comes to mind”Armitage also described Kashmir as “most dangerous place in the world” during his speech in Sydney in 2003.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Kashmir-most-dangerous-place-Armitage/articleshow/131451.cms

Maakhter (talk) 17:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Maakhter, all those references and statements combined together make point for a single statement in the Kashmir article pointing out that the region has been claimed to be dangerous. An article with such a title will not make something you will see in an encyclopedia. News and encyclopedic articles differ in their nature. --lTopGunl (talk) 00:30, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.