Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karmen Berentsen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Karmen Berentsen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businesswoman who doesn't meet biographical notability or general notability. Purely local publicity, mostly the usual vanity hits. Google search reveals that she exists, that her boutique exists, and some sort of civil case with Titan Technology. Neither she nor her boutique is notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:49, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:54, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of enduring notability and GNG. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:58, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I agree that this individual isn't meeting GNG based on sourcing and search to date. Purely local business person. Montanabw^(talk) 05:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:ANYBIO. Also detecting undertones of WP:PROMO. DrStrauss talk 10:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.