Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karishma Sawant (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G4: this is exactly the same article as the one from the AfD that was closed 8 days ago. Salting as well. Black Kite (talk) 18:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karishma Sawant[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Karishma Sawant

Actress who does not satisfy acting notability or general notability. Acting notability requires multiple major roles, but only one role is listed. Nothing in this article amounts to significant coverage by independent reliable sources. The one reference is an announcement of her role, which is not independent or secondary. Many of the statements are not substantiated by the footnotes that are required in a biography of a living person.

This article was submitted to Articles for Creation, and was declined by User:Dan arndt as failing acting notability, and then pushed to article space anyway. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karishma Sawant two weeks ago. Nothing has changed, except that the re-creation is tendentious. A G4 might be in order, but we are already here. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete G4. Mccapra (talk) 09:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NACTOR. Dan arndt (talk) 09:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not sufficiently notable. Possibly G4. Pikavoom ^Talk 10:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. ManaliJain (talk) 12:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - please can an admin move the article back to mainspace so that the AfD can resume? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.