Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karine Plantadit-Bageot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz has listed RSs that show notability that I missed among the trivial credits when I initially looked. Unless the trout get me, I will add the sources that this article (currently with no RSs) needs to establish notability so that the article is no longer an embarrassment to Wikipedia. Novaseminary (talk) 23:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Karine Plantadit-Bageot[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article seems to fail WP:ENT and WP:BIO. A Tony Award nomination doesn't meet ENT. And her coverage is limited to credits and brief mentions in reviews of performances. There is no substantial coverage so she fails BIO/GNG. Novaseminary (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She is a rising Broadway star She was in original of several shows (yes ensemble but still original). If a Tony nomination isn't enough what is? JDDJS (talk) 19:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would suggest that a Tony win would go a long way, as would significant coverage. Novaseminary (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, speedy close, and slap the nominator with an entire school of trout. A Tony nomination is more than sufficient to establish notability for a performer, as would be the critical coverage cited in the NY Times profile to say nothing of the Times profile itself [1]). Or the Dance Magazine profile [2]. Or the well over 100 mentions in NYTimes arts coverage alone. This AFD is an embarassment to Wikipedia. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.