Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karina Roweth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus post relisting seems clear the sources are not sufficient for notability. Fenix down (talk) 23:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karina Roweth[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and has played only a few games in a non-fully-professional league not listed at WP:FPL, failing WP:NFOOTBALL. Geschichte (talk) 07:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 08:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sourcing is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 20:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - there is some in-depth coverage but it's all from the same newspaper [1] [2] [3]. If there is another source providing this level of coverage then I think the article should stay. Spiderone 16:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. N:FOOTY and its essay is inadequate for players in top women's football (soccer) leagues around the world. Hmlarson (talk) 01:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Number 5 7 20:51, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seems to be a degree of coverage, no clear consensus to delete or keep, no harm extending for another week to allow for further discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 07:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect No solid reason has been given to justify the deletion of this content while valid alternatives exist. If she is not worthy of a standalone article this can be redirected somewhere. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That would work best if there were an article like List of W-League players to redirect and merge to Spiderone 17:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Roweth fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Two articles written within roughly a month of each other in 2009 + a bizarre focus on her in the headline "Roweth caught up in spiteful end to Young Matildas game" do not make her pass GNG. Dougal18 (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, she fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. The W-League was sadly nowhere near as relevant in 2008-2009 as it is now. The one newspaper she received coverage in, the Central Western Daily, serves a population of about 40,000, not enough in my book to be considered reliable. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - since the only source that has given her any coverage is just the one local paper and since there is no realistic redirect or merge target, I will have to agree that this should be deleted for now Spiderone 09:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.