Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Young (actress)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Most participants judge that her roles in multiple productions were significant enough to indicate presumed notability under WP:NACTOR. Since the arguments for deletion also focus on the same SNG (just making the opposite judgment about the significance of her roles), the majority judgment is enough for a keep result in this discussion. RL0919 (talk) 02:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Young (actress)[edit]

Karen Young (actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has only had minor roles, does not meet WP:NACTOR Rusf10 (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not meet the multiple significant roles in notable productions threshold.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The top 10,000 of the IMDb StarMeter is a good sign for notability, and she has been in the top 10,000 for much of the time over the last 20 years. I would give her the benefit of the doubt as to notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Where in our notability guidelines does it say to use an IMDb ranking to judge notability? Also, IMDb is not considered a reliable source.--Rusf10 (talk) 14:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep I found a number of pieces from reliable sources that talk about her film and theatre career. Her performances in certain stage productions have been noticed by the press. Yet not the greatest case for notability. Perhaps someone with theatre chops or who has Variety access could find and add more. --DiamondRemley39 (talk) 15:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete-Splinemath (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Extensive filmography Djflem (talk) 13:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: several main roles in notable films (Heat, Jaws: The Revenge, Criminal Law, among others). Meets WP:NACTOR. A definite keep, in my opinion. Dflaw4 (talk) 10:16, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - lead roles on Broadway and several supporting roles in films. She was rated a top ten performer by the New Yorker. Bearian (talk) 19:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While an absolute numerical reading of the votes would make it a Keep, at least one Keep vote isn't policy backed, so a relist for a clearer consensus seems reasonable (particularly due to disagreement over specific SNGs being satisfied). If it becomes very obvious in a couple of days I'm happy to close it then, if preferred
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.