Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Post

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Post[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real claim to notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 23:59, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this PROMO for a WP:MILL marketing guru. Writing books is part of the self-promotion, doesn't contribute to notabilit when, as here, the books get not reviews, generate no profiles or feature coverage. Post does get quoted occasionally, but fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 16:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:26, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and E.M.Gregory. - GretLomborg (talk) 19:36, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.