Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Davis (politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 09:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Davis (politician)[edit]

Karen Davis (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable mayor holding an unnotable position. No sufficient sources found to indicate notability. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the size of the bundle. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Police, Christianity, and California. WCQuidditch 07:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Glendora is nowhere close to large enough that its mayors would receive an automatic presumption of notability just for existing as mayors — the notability test at the local level of office hinges not on minimally verifying that the person exists, but on maximally sourcing substantial content about their political impact: specific things they did as mayor, specific projects they spearheaded as mayor, significant effects their mayoralty had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But there's nothing like that here, and the article is extremely overdependent on non-GNG-building junk sourcing, like Flickr photos and her own self-published campaign site, rather than evidence that she had anywhere near enough media coverage to pass NPOL #2. Bearcat (talk) 20:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Bearcat. Also reads promotionally - it's not encyclopedic to talk about the fact you like fun runs. SportingFlyer T·C 20:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per All. Okoslavia (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.