Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karelia Software
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:50, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Karelia Software[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Karelia Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Company that doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Its only real coverage in secondary sources is brief mentions about being 'sherlocked' (eg [1][2]), but this is not enough to even meet the GNG. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - looks like its already been deleted. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.