Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karan Verma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn‎. (non-admin closure) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karan Verma[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one lead role, nothing else notable. Fails WP:NACTOR.

I am also nominating the following related pages because fails WP:NACTOR.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 22:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 22:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 22:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Maybe only one lead role but it looks like Ajmer 92 will be a very notable and controversial film. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz: Even if Karan Verma is notable, Surya Sreenivas (bundled above) isn't right? DareshMohan (talk) 00:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems notable as even though ~~having at least~~ he only had one lead role in a clearly notable film ~~(Criterion for notability of Creative professionals).~~ (And: Surya Sreenivas might be okayish.) -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC) (Edited, see below, my bad!)[reply]
Comment @Mushy Yank: @Liz:

Both of these people are actors not creative professionals.
The criterion is "The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions;" or "The person has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment."
There is nothing unique for both of them; they did not direct or write any films, so first criterion.
Karan Verma: With just one film, it is a WP:Too early.
Surya Sreenivas:

Film	Role	Notes	Notable
Karam Dosa	Second lead	Shivakumar Ramachandravarapu has a bigger character. No 2 reliable reviews.	Yes
Nenosta	Lead	No article. No 2 reliable reviews.	No
Mahanati	Supporting/cameo	portrayed actor NTR	Yes
Kudi Yedamaithe	Supporting		Yes

DareshMohan (talk) 03:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are right but Karan Verma has attracted quite a lot of attention for his only role so far. Even with what's currently on the page, can we not say that he meets the general criterion ("People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject")? (I'll leave it at that) -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 04:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So one notable film = multiple films? DareshMohan (talk) 04:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. Who said that? He meets the general criterion for people not the specific criteria for actors. Again, I'll leave it that, thank you. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 04:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mushy Yank: What makes Surya Sreenivas okayish notable? 4 of his lead films have no article/2 reviews. DareshMohan (talk) 04:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Significant is not necessarily a lead role. One lead role in a film at least. And significant characters in 3/4 web series. I'm really leaving it at that, now. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 04:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I, the nominator, withdraw my nomination. DareshMohan (talk) 03:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.