Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaqusha Jashari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 05:43, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kaqusha Jashari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source cited for this article is another language Wikipedia. Although the article is short it is, apparently, still inaccurate, though I can't yet discern the nature of the inaccuracy or verify that due to a paucity of reliable sources. notability is open to question, there are plenty of toher holders of this office for whom we do not have articles. Guy (Help!) 11:19, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong speedy keep. If article is short and need more source than another language wikipedia, then there are suitable tags for marking the article which may inspire users to pay attention to this article, especially on the WikiProjekt page connected with this article (Serbia, Kosovo...). Maybe there were other people on the same position that would fail notability test on wikipedia, but in her case, she played very important role in very important period of history of the region. There are of course reliable sources that can support text of the article, but author failed to present them because author made mistake and estimated that she is well known.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the obvious notability demonstrated by the sources found by the Google Books search spoon-fed in the nomination. Is it really too much to expect any editor, let alone an administrator, to make such a basic check before nominating an article for deletion? Phil Bridger (talk) 22:05, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep just because we don't yet have articles on all other holders of this office doesn't mean we should delete the articles we already have. If you don't agree with the policy that such Politicians are notable then I suggest trying to change the policy, not trying to delete articles that meet current notability requirements Ϣere SpielChequers 21:04, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Major Kosovar political figure. Ray^Talk 15:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notability should be beyond question; but the article needs much better sourcing. I added a couple of refs; more would be welcome. I would remind the nominator that if nobody's written articles on other politicians, that doesn't mean this politician must be non-notable. bobrayner (talk) 04:50, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.