Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanoko Hatamiya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kanoko Hatamiya[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable roles are nil. The article's claim on the subject being famous for her limited roles is unsourced. Reliable sources on the subject are also close to none, with Atelier Peach being the only reliable source. Subject is non-notable in any means of the word. Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment she's in a bunch of adult video games according to VADB, but it may not mean she is notable. Adding delsort to video games. [1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:59, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely. Which is why I've nominated the subject for deletion. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 01:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable, not enough coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no notable roles, fails WP:ENT. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.