Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kane hemmings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snowball Delete --JForget 01:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kane hemmings[edit]
- Kane hemmings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Just declined a speedy on this one as some notability is asserted however I do not believe it is enough to pass WP:ATHLETE nor the informal guidelines at WP:FOOTY as he has not yet made a first team appearance for a club in a fully professional league. nancy (talk) 15:12, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I have to admit the article is hard for me to read in its current format but, I didn't see an assertion of notability. Either way he fails not only WP:ATHLETE but, also WP:BIO so should be Deleted. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - then again, I have a sort of vested interest as it was my speedy that was declined :-) CultureDrone (talk) 16:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:ATHLETE and even the more inclusive WP:FOOTY. And before people start saying it, no, the unsourced claim that this 16 year old kid has signed a contract with Rangers does not mean that he meets WP:ATHLETE, he has to actually play for them, something which he probably won't do for at least a year if at all....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk)
- Delete, fails notability. --Jimbo[online] 20:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. BanRay 21:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE. пﮟოьεԻ 57 15:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 16:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. A long, long way from meeting the criteria for an article per WP:N and WP:Athlete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.